Home › Guides › Finding a maker

China, the United States, Taiwan or Mexico: choosing where to make a first run

For a first batch the cheapest unit price usually loses. What actually decides it is minimum order, cash-out time, and how expensive a mistake is to fix.

Updated September 21, 2026·4 min read

Founders settle this question by default — someone recommends a supplier, and the country comes along with them. It is worth making as a decision, because for a first run the deciding factor is almost never the unit price, and the country changes three things that matter more: the minimum you can order, how long your cash is out, and what happens when something is wrong.

The comparison that actually matters

The number that decides it: cash-out time

A China run at $1.10 a unit and a US run at $1.85 a unit look like an obvious choice until you account for when the money leaves. The overseas order takes a deposit of 30% to 50% before production, the balance before shipping, then five to eight weeks at sea, then customs. Your cash is committed for three to five months before a single unit can be sold.

For a first-time founder funding a batch personally, that is frequently the binding constraint, not the price. A 68% higher unit cost that turns over twice in the time the cheaper option turns over once is not more expensive in any sense you care about.

Cost of a mistake

This is the column founders discover rather than plan for. First batches have errors: an ingredient in the wrong order on the label, a fill weight a little light, a cap that scuffs in transit, a printed colour that is not the colour you approved. Domestically, most of those are a week and a courier. From overseas, a reprint is a new production slot and a new shipment, and a fix that would have cost $400 costs $4,000 and eight weeks.

Which is an argument for making the first run close to home even at a worse price, and moving production once the specification has stopped changing. The specification stops changing later than anyone expects.

Where each genuinely wins

• China — packaging components, without qualification. The range of tubes, jars, pumps, closures and finishes available at reasonable minimums is not matched anywhere. If your product needs a specific airless pump or an unusual cap, this is where it exists.
• United States — anything where speed of iteration, a site visit, or domestic regulatory paperwork matters. Also the default for food and drink, where shipping bulk liquid across an ocean rarely makes sense.
• Taiwan — strong in specific technical niches, and often a step up in consistency from the cheapest Chinese quotes at a moderate premium. Worth a look for precision components.
• Mexico — the underused option for North American brands. Truck freight instead of ocean, timezone overlap, a national establishment registry that makes suppliers unusually findable, and lead times close to domestic.

Split the run, not the relationship

The most common good answer is not one country. It is packaging from where packaging is good and filling close to where you sell — bottles from China, formula and filling in the United States. You take on one extra logistics leg and you get the component range of one market with the iteration speed of the other.

That arrangement has a name and a shape: it is co-packing, and it is also a way under a minimum.

Whatever you choose, price it landed

A cross-border comparison is meaningless at the quote line. Freight, duty, brokerage and the domestic leg have to be in the number before the two options can be set beside each other, and the gap between quoted and landed is routinely 40% or more on an overseas run — how to get to a landed number.